Modern computers rely heavily on graphics. For example, you are most likely reading this article on a computer whose operating system is based on a graphical user interface (GUI) that serves as the primary interface between user and computer. You may enjoy playing video games or creating 3-D graphics and animations. In fact, if you are using your computer for anything other than the most basic business-oriented tasks (word processing, spreadsheets), you probably use lots of graphics.
The graphics card in a modern PC can connect in one of several different ways:
- Onboard - The graphics chips and memory are built right onto the motherboard.
- PCI - The graphics card plugs into the PCI bus.
- AGP - The graphics card plugs into a slot dedicated to graphics use.
Now, you will learn about AGP, or Accelerated Graphics Port. AGP was developed by Intel as a way to enhance the performance and speed of the graphics hardware connected to a PC. You will learn how AGP came about, how it works and what the future holds for PC graphics subsystems.
Step on the Accelerator
The need for streaming video and real-time-rendered 3-D games requires an even faster throughput than that provided by PCI. In 1996, Intel debuted the Accelerated Graphics Port (AGP), a modification of the PCI bus designed specifically to facilitate the use of streaming video and high-performance graphics.
Image courtesy Intel Corporation
Diagram of the standard architecture of a Pentium III-based system using AGP
Like virtually all other components in a computer, graphics cards prior to AGP relied on a bus to connect to the central processing unit (CPU). Essentially, a bus is the channel or path between the components in a computer.
While AGP is based on the PCI bus, and is often referred to as the "AGP bus," it is not actually a bus system. Instead, it is a point-to-point connection. In other words, the only device connecting through AGP to the CPU and system memory is the graphics card. There are no other "stops" to make on the path. Therefore, it is not truly a bus.
AGP provides two major enhancements over PCI:
Let's look at exactly how AGP works so we can understand what these enhancements mean.
- Faster performance
- Direct access to system memory
This is a typical example of an AGP-based graphics card.
AGP uses several techniques to achieve faster performance:
- AGP is a 32-bit bus with a clock rate of 66 megahertz (MHz, or million cycles per second). This means that in one second, it can transfer 32 bits (4 bytes) of data 66-million times. The transfer rate increases when you go to 2x and 4x mode (more about modes in this section).
- There are no other devices on the AGP bus, which means that the graphics card does not have to share the bus. The graphics card is always able to operate at the maximum capacity of the connection.
- AGP uses pipelining to increase speed. Pipelining organizes data retrieval into a sort of assembly-line process. The graphics card receives multiple chunks of data in response to a single request.
Think of pipelining as placing an order for a seven-course dinner: You can tell the waiter the first thing that you want, wait for him to bring it, then tell him the next thing you want, wait for him to bring it and so on until you're done with your order. Or you can tell the waiter everything you want at once and let him start bringing it to you. You'll get the courses in the same sequence either way, but it's much more efficient without the additional discussions.
- AGP uses sideband addressing, which allows the graphics card to request and issue addressing information using eight additional address lines that are separate from the 32-bit path used to transfer data.
A good analogy for sideband addressing is the request line at a radio station. Consider the music that the station is playing as data flowing from system memory to the graphics card. You call in to the station's request line and ask for a song to be played next. Your request does not interfere with the current song that is playing, but it does tell the station what should be queued next. Sideband addressing essentially does the same thing for AGP.
Aside from performance speed, the other enhancement over PCI is that AGP-based graphics cards can directly access system memory through the AGP bus at full speed. This is a very important component of AGP. Texture maps are a key part of computer graphics and take up a huge amount of memory on a typical graphics card. Because video RAM normally costs more and is restricted by the size of the graphics card, the number and size of textures used onscreen was limited in earlier graphics cards. But AGP-based systems can take advantage of the system memory to store textures and other data normally maintained in the video RAM on a card.
In a typical non-AGP system, such as one that uses a PCI-based graphics card, every texture map is stored twice. First, it is loaded from the hard drive to system memory. When the texture map is about to be used, it is pulled from system memory to the CPU for processing. It is then sent back through the PCI bus to the graphics card, where it is stored again in the card's framebuffer. In effect, every texture map is processed and stored twice -- once by the system and once by the graphics card.
Image courtesy Intel Corporation
With PCI, texture maps are loaded from the hard drive to system memory, processed by the CPU and then loaded into the framebuffer of the graphics card.
AGP stores texture maps only once. The key to this is a part of the AGP chipset called the Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART). The GART allocates portions of system memory to hold texture maps, but makes the CPU and graphics card think that the texture maps are all in the card's framebuffer. The GART may have to put bits and pieces of the texture maps in different addresses within system memory, but it all appears as one large chunk of memory to the graphics card.
Image courtesy Intel Corporation
In AGP, texture maps are loaded from the hard drive to system memory to be used directly by the graphics card.
As you can see, in a non-AGP card, each texture is redundant (stored twice), the CPU has to do extra work and the size and number of textures are limited by the framebuffer. All of these factors combine to limit the card's capability compared to an AGP-based card.
Down The Road
Currently, there are three specifications of AGP:
AGP 2.0, which includes the original 1.0 version, provides for three modes of operation. The interesting thing about the various modes is that they are all running at the AGP bus speed of 66 MHz. But a 2x AGP graphics card sends data twice every clock cycle instead of once, and a 4x AGP card sends data four times per cycle. Look at the chart below to see how the modes compare.
AGP Pro is based on AGP 2.0, but provides a longer slot with additional power for professional-level graphics cards. A computer with either an AGP Pro or AGP 2.0 slot will work with both AGP 1.0 and AGP 2.0 cards. But an AGP 1.0 slot is not compatible with either of the other specifications.
This motherboard has an AGP 2.0 connector.
Intel is currently working on a new specification called AGP8x. Although it is based on the same 66-MHz clock, the AGP8x specification is different in that features that were not being utilized have been removed in order to simplify and streamline the design, while other features have been added. Most importantly, performance will be increased significantly. Look at the chart below to see what AGP8x could offer.
A motherboard that supports the AGP8x specification will be backwards-compatible with existing AGP. For more information, you can review the draft for AGP8x on this page.
Before There Was AGP
The original PC bus operated at 4.77 MHz and was 8 bits wide, meaning it could process 8 bits of data in each cycle. In 1982, it improved to 16 bits at 8 MHz and officially became known as Industry Standard Architecture (ISA). This bus design is capable of passing along data at a rate of up to 16 MBps.
Early graphics cards, from the Monochrome Display Adapter of the early 1980s through Super Video Graphics Array (SVGA) adapters in the 1990s, plugged into an ISA slot on the motherboard of the computer. As the number of colors and resolution of the display increased, ISA-based graphics cards were simply too slow. The ISA bus could not pump the image data to the CPU fast enough.
Over the years, ISA-based graphics cards were replaced with VESA Local Bus (VL-Bus) graphics cards. The Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) agreed on a standard implementation of SVGA that provided up to 16.8-million colors and 1280x1024 resolution. These cards plugged into a special slot on the motherboard that was on a separate bus from ISA. The graphics bus was considered a local bus because it was connected directly to the CPU and had to be physically near it.
The VL-Bus was 32 bits wide and operated at the speed of the local bus, which was normally the speed of the processor itself. The VL-Bus essentially tied directly into the CPU. This worked okay for a single device, or maybe even two. But connecting more than two devices to the VL-Bus introduced the possibility of interference with the performance of the CPU. Because of this, the VL-Bus was typically used only for connecting a graphics card, a component that really benefits from high-speed access to the CPU.
VL-Bus cards communicated with the CPU at the same speed as the CPU's clock. What this means is that if a CPU were rated at 100 MHz, the graphics card transferred 32 bits of data 100-million times per second. There were two problems with this approach:
- The graphics-card manufacturer had no idea how fast a customer's system would be.
- Tying directly into the CPU could actually slow the CPU down, resulting in poorer performance.
The introduction of the PCI bus greatly improved graphics-card performance, but it still wasn't enough.
Along comes Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), a completely new bus standard. The PCI bus is something of a hybrid between ISA and VL-Bus. It provides direct access to system memory for connected devices, but uses a bridge to connect to the CPU. Basically, this means that it is capable of even higher performance than VL-Bus while eliminating the potential for interference with the CPU.
Now, AGP provides higher-performance graphics processing than PCI. With even more improvements in the queue for AGP, it looks like graphics technology will continue to keep up with graphic designers, meaning the coolest computer images are yet to come.
For more information on AGP and related topics, check out the links on the next page!
Lots More Information!
Related stuff.dewsoftoverseas.com Articles
More Great Links!